Cargill, the world's largest trader of agricultural commodities, is threatening to halt business with one of its suppliers based on information that points toward the company's deforestation activites. Sinar Mas, a major Indonesian palm oil supplier, has been accused of illegal land-clearing activities to create plantation ground for its palm oil production. Sinar Mas assures that once further investigation is completed, its business with Cargill will remain. However, other buyers, like Nestle who is switching suppliers and Unilever who scrapped a $33 million contract with Sinar Mas, are way past threatening. Their business relationship with Sinar Mas is no more, because these multinationals didn't want to harm their companies' global perception because of their supplier's actions.
Companies stop business relationships all the time; so, why is this particular situation significant from a food marketer's standpoint? None of these buyers had any real issues with what they were buying. The issues that terminated the supplier/buyer relationship had nothing to do with the quality or physical ascpect of the product that was being transacted.
Here, we see the extension of a generic commodity to what Theodore Levitt would call a product bundle + intangibles. In business relationships, there are intangibles that are added into a product bundle with the commodity/product that are remarkably influential. It was an "intangible" part of the "product bundle" that Sinar Mas created that was unwanted by its buyer. Nestle, Unilever and now Cargill can't do business anymore with Sinar Mas. But did this have anything to do with the product? Nothing. The problem was entirely in the risk of tarnishing the perception of the buyer, and how that was affected by WHO they bought palm oil from, and HOW it was being produced, but not WHAT it was.
Many factors, be it technology, globalization, or media influence, make any business relationship extremely fragile nowadays, in that absolutely EVERYTHING that is offered to the other company matters. Every aspect of what you sell/buy and how you go about it in a business relationship can be influential, even if it is "intangible."
The intangibles that are included in the product bundle are significant. So significant, in fact, that it cost Sinar Mas a relationship with some of the most recognizable food companies in the world.
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/79510d4c-37af-11df-88c6-00144feabdc0.html
Theodore Levitt: http://cte.jhu.edu/courses/pii/marketing%20success%20through%20differentiation.pdf
averbec2, 2 years ago | FlagI don't think you can really blame these companies for their actions. In a world full of "corporate
sustainabl iity" and going green, these companies are doing the right thing to protect their image. In matters of business to business relationsh ips you have to look and see which relationsh ips these companies value more. Obviously, the end consumer has a greater influence and impact on these multinatio nals then their suppliers. I think they made a wise decision to not associate themselves with suppliers that contribute to the destructio n of forests.
Eli, 2 years ago | FlagI agree. I think that the consumer is really at an advantage given informatio
n technology and the speed of informatio n currently. Incidents like this completely change perception s, which make companies 100% accountabl e in every aspect of their business chain. Thanks for the comment.
jobes1, 2 years ago | FlagOne of the great things for the modern-day
consumer is the amount of informatio n that is readily available to them. Because customers are well-imfor med to the actions of businesses and their partnershi ps, it incentiviz es good behavior among corporatio ns. In today's world, one wrong or inappropri ate associatio n could completely cripple a company's financial position, leaving its competitor s to gain market share and profit.
Flagging notifies the Business Relationships webmaster of inappropriate content. Please flag any messages that violate the Terms of Service. Please include a short explanation why you're flagging this message. Thank you!
If you believe this content violates the Terms of Service, please write a short description why. Thank you.
Flagging notifies the Business Relationships webmaster of inappropriate content. Please flag any messages that violate the Terms of Service. Please include a short explanation why you're flagging this message. Thank you!
Your First Name (optional)
Email Addresses (comma separated)
Import friends
Message to Friends (optional)
Are you human?
Or, you can forward this blog with your own email application.